Clinical Sciences/Health Conditions
Kazu AMIMOTO, PhD
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Professor
Sendai Seiyo Gakuin University
Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
Yuichi Kato, MS
Department of Rehabilitation, PT
Moriyama Nou-Shinkei Centre
Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Hiromi Oowada, PhD
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Professor
Sendai Seiyo Gakuin University
Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
Tomoki Koseki, PhD
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences
Sendai Seiyo Gakuin University
Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
The subjects comprised 40 cases of right hemisphere stroke. These 40 cases were classified into two groups based on SCP assessment. Specifically, the Pusher positive group (SCP ≥ 1.75) was designated as Group A (n=26), while the Pusher tendency group (0 < SCP < 1.75) was designated as Group B (n=14).
To assess fall fear, the examiner grasped both shoulders and slowly tilted the trunk toward the non-paralysed or paralysed side. On the non-paralysed side, a fear sensation at approximately 10°of tilt was scored as 1 point; a fear sensation between 10°and 30°was scored as 0.5 points. On the paretic side, a score of 1 point was assigned if no fear was felt even when tilted significantly (indifference). Statistical analysis employed the unpaired t-test or Mann-Whitney U test.
Results: Fear of falling during seated trunk tilt towards the non-paralysed side Group A scored 0.59, Group B 0.28. The Pusher positive group showed higher values (p< 0.01). Meanwhile, for leaning towards the paralysed side and indifference, Group A scored 0.65, Group B 0. 60, showing no significant difference.
Conclusion:
These results revealed that Group A exhibited resistance to postural correction towards the non-paralysed side, while showing indifference to falls towards the paralysed side. Conversely, in Group B indifference towards the paralysed side was more pronounced than fear of non-paralysed side tilting.